How old is the earth based on radiometric dating
“Evolution is structure supported by two pillars: one is chance, and the other is time.Chance is required because we obviously can’t say that a thinking force created life on earth. If you kick out one of those two pillars the whole structure collapses,” Armitage noted.“The other pillar is time because you cannot get a man from a frog unless the princess kissed the frog. So in science you have to have deep time to get evolution.” Subsequent to the controversy, Armitage has been on additional digs and found more soft tissue but is finding it difficult to get published.The Triassic began in the wake of the Permian–Triassic extinction event, which left the earth's biosphere impoverished; it would take well into the middle of this period for life to recover its former diversity.Therapsids and archosaurs were the chief terrestrial vertebrates during this time.
So CSUN settled with Armitage for 9,500 in 2016, according to .
The whole discussion of evolution ends if you show that the earth is young.
You can just erase evolution off the whiteboard because of soft tissue in dinosaur bones.” Armitage was hired as a microscopist to manage CSUN’s electron and confocal microscope suite in 2010.
His findings seconded groundbreaking discoveries by noted molecular paleontologist Mary Schweitzer, who triggered an earthquake in the world of paleontology when she published about soft tissue in dinosaur bones in 2005.
(Schweitzer subsequently postulated that iron is responsible for preserving the soft tissue.) Armitage’s February 2013 study was published in the peer-reviewed , a journal of cell and tissue research. A biology professor had come into his office and said, “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department.” Armitage fought back.